Tech Comparison
Cyberhaven vs Code42:
Uncovering Key Differences
We know the evaluation process for security technology is burdensome. To help simplify it, we’ve outlined the key differences between Code42 Incydr™ and Cyberhaven Data Detection and Response™ – and why Incydr is a better solution to protect your insider threats.
Finding the ‘right fit’ solution for data protection
Code42 Incydr and Cyberhaven Data Detection and Response are both cloud-based data protection solutions that help security teams detect, investigate and respond to insider threats. Both solutions can take action to protect data and stop exfiltration.
Why Incydr is the better solution to protect your data
AI-enabled prioritization
Cyberhaven relies heavily on policy-based methods that add significant administrative burden to security teams. Incydr uses an AI-enabled prioritization model to uncover potential exfiltration risks that may have gone unnoticed by rules-based methods.
Improves user behaviors
While Incydr blocks insider activity just like Cyberhaven, blocking is not always the most effective. Instead, responding with Instructor’s timely security trainings can reduce 36% of low-risk insider activity in only 4 months.
Seamless interoperability
Unlike Cyberhaven, Incydr is an API-first platform. With 30+ integrations with leaders like CrowdStrike, Tines, Workday, Slack, Okta, Splunk, SumoLogic and Rapid7, it ensures seamless security team workflows.
How Incydr stacks up against Cyberhaven
Here’s a snapshot of how exactly Code42 Incydr’s key capabilities compare to Cyberhaven.
| Feature Name | Code42 | Cyberhaven | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rapid Deployment and Ease of Use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Policy creation & management
|
AI-enabled prioritization model detects risks out-of-the-box with no configuration. | Requires you to set up policies and determine what events are risky on your own. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corrective Response Controls
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real-time user blocking
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insider threat remediation
|
Case management and integrated containment controls | Requires an outside tool to track notes and share evidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User correction
|
Triggered video lessons and pop-ups provide in-the-moment education-based controls. | Pop-ups | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Impact on User Systems
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Endpoint disruption
|
Typically less than 1% usage | Testers complain of device impact | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ecosystem
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of integrations
|
30+ integrations across SIEM, EDR, IAM and SOAR to provide seamless interoperability. | Not identified | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resources & Guidance
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Communications templates
|
– | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Program RACI examples
|
– | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dedicated CSM
|
– | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Cyberhaven never came close to what Incydr can provide.”
After completing trials of both Incydr and Data Detection & Response, prospects (who are now customers!) reported Cyberhaven’s product never came close to what Incydr could offer – and realized much of what Cyberhaven promised was vaporware.
Connect With Sales
Don’t Just Take Our Word
Our 65 Gartner reviews speak for themselves
That’s 55 more reviews than Cyberhaven has.
Read Customer Reviews